Policy
NYC School Restraint and Seclusion: NY's New Reporting Law
NY released its first 2024-25 restraint and seclusion data in October 2025 but didn't break out NYC. The framework, the data gap, and what families can do.
Key Finding
On August 2, 2023, NY State banned seclusion, prone restraint, corporal punishment, and aversive interventions in schools under 8 NYCRR § 19.5. Beginning with the 2024-25 school year, every public school district, BOCES, charter, state-operated and private residential school must file an annual report on physical restraint, timeout, and substantiated abuse allegations. NYSED released the first statewide dataset on October 31, 2025: more than 3,600 students restrained or placed in timeout in at least 20,000 incidents, with roughly 20% of public schools not reporting and no NYC breakout. Federal Civil Rights Data Collection numbers show students with disabilities are 13% of US enrollment but more than three-quarters of students subjected to restraint and seclusion. NYC's prior federal reporting was so incomplete that the U.S. Department of Education placed the district on an Action Plan in 2017-18, with restraint and seclusion data effectively zeroed out. NYC has paid more than $160 million in Child Victims Act settlements since 2019, with 135 of 161 settlements against the DOE or former DOE staff.
On August 2, 2023, the New York Board of Regents adopted 8 NYCRR § 19.5. The regulation banned seclusion, prone restraint, corporal punishment, and aversive interventions in NY schools.
Beginning with the 2024-25 school year, every public school district, BOCES, charter, state-operated and private residential school must file an annual report to the State Education Department. The reports cover physical restraint, timeout, and substantiated and unsubstantiated allegations of corporal punishment, mechanical restraint, prone restraint, aversive interventions, and seclusion.
75%+
of U.S. students subjected to school restraint and seclusion have disabilities, though they make up only 13% of enrollment. National pattern from federal Civil Rights Data Collection.
NYSED released the first statewide dataset on October 31, 2025. It showed more than 3,600 students physically restrained or placed in timeout in at least 20,000 incidents during 2024-25, with roughly 20% of public schools not reporting at all. The state did not break out New York City or District 75. So the question that matters most to NYC families, how often city schools restrain or seclude students, still has no public district-level answer.
The reason the new state requirement matters is what came before it. NYC’s prior federal reporting was so incomplete that the U.S. Department of Education placed the district on an Action Plan for the 2017-18 Civil Rights Data Collection. The restraint and seclusion module was effectively zeroed out due to large amounts of missing data. For the better part of a decade, the federal dataset that should have answered the question of how often NYC schools restrain or seclude students did not answer it.
What the New Regulation Requires
8 NYCRR § 19.5 applies to all schools serving NY students. It permits physical restraint only when immediate intervention is necessary to prevent imminent danger of serious physical harm. The intervention must be the least restrictive option, must not restrict breathing or communication, and must be performed by trained staff. Seclusion is prohibited outright. Prone restraint is prohibited outright. Corporal punishment and aversive interventions are prohibited outright.
8 NYCRR § 200.22 applies specifically to students with disabilities. It requires schools to conduct functional behavioral assessments, develop and implement behavior intervention plans, and notify parents before timeout is used.
The reporting requirement that took effect in 2024-25 covers seven categories.
| Reporting Category | Status |
|---|---|
| Physical restraint | Permitted in narrow circumstances; reportable when used |
| Timeout | Permitted under conditions; reportable |
| Corporal punishment | Prohibited; allegations reportable, substantiated and unsubstantiated |
| Mechanical restraint | Prohibited; allegations reportable |
| Prone restraint | Prohibited; allegations reportable |
| Aversive interventions | Prohibited; allegations reportable |
| Seclusion | Prohibited; allegations reportable |
For each event, schools must report the location, the duration, the reason for the intervention, and the type of training the staff involved had received. Submissions go through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) using the eScholar Student Restraint Event template. The frequency was upgraded from semiannual to annual starting 2024-25.
The National Pattern
What NY is now requiring schools to report has been documented at the federal level for more than a decade. The numbers establish the baseline against which NYC’s first state report should be read.
The Office for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Education has required restraint and seclusion counts since the 2009-10 Civil Rights Data Collection. The most recently published cycle is 2021-22, released in January 2025. The figures below draw on the 2020-21 cycle, which OCR released in November 2023. National figures published by Brookings in its analysis of the CRDC data show three patterns that have held across multiple collection cycles.
Students with disabilities make up 13% of US public school enrollment but more than three-quarters of all students subjected to restraint and seclusion. Black students make up 15% of US public school enrollment but account for 35% of students subjected to seclusion and 34% of students subjected to mechanical restraint. The 2017-18 cycle nationally reported 101,990 students restrained or secluded. The 2020-21 cycle dropped to 52,800 students, a decline most analysts attribute to the COVID period of remote instruction rather than a structural reduction in the practice.
The federal data also has a quality problem. Roughly 70% of districts report zero incidents in CRDC submissions despite documented parent complaints, and the Government Accountability Office has criticized OCR data quality on these elements. NYC’s Action Plan placement in 2017-18 is the most consequential example of that data quality problem.
What NYC Has Already Paid
While the restraint and seclusion data has been missing, NYC has been paying for school-based abuse on a different track.
The Child Victims Act opened a one-year revival window for time-barred childhood sexual abuse claims that ran from August 14, 2019 through August 14, 2021. More than 10,000 claims were filed during the window. Per the Child USA Institute, roughly 13.4% named a public or non-public school as defendant.
NYC paid more than $160 million in CVA settlements through October 2024 according to City & State NY’s analysis. Of 161 NYC settlements, 135 were against the DOE or former DOE staff. Across all 161 settlements, that averages roughly $994,000 per case. Less than 13% of NYC CVA cases had moved past discovery at the time of that report, meaning the settlement total continues to grow.
Specific named settlements paid by the NYC DOE, reported by City & State NY, include the following. These are settlements the city paid as defendant, not results of this firm.
$4.5M
NYC DOE Settlement (Third Party)
Across two cases involving Russell Bracher, a former NYC public school band instructor.
Reported New York case, not a case this firm handled.
$2.4M
NYC DOE Settlement (Third Party), 2022
Involving Nicholas Auriti, a former PE teacher at Bay Academy.
Reported New York case, not a case this firm handled.
$1.25M
NYC DOE Settlement (Third Party)
Involving Frank Mickens, a former NYC public school principal, deceased.
Reported New York case, not a case this firm handled.
$1.25M
NYC DOE Settlement (Third Party)
Involving Reginald Landeau Jr., a former NYC public school principal.
Reported New York case, not a case this firm handled.
The Office of the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District (SCI) is the independent agency that investigates serious misconduct in NYC schools. SCI’s CY 2024 annual report documented a record 11,874 complaints received. The office initiated 484 investigations and substantiated 171, finding 252 people or entities in violation. SCI specifically conducted 146 investigations into inappropriate or sexual misconduct by DOE staff or vendors, with 43 substantiated.
These are not restraint and seclusion numbers. They are the numbers from a parallel accountability track that has been running for years. The new NYSED reporting requirement adds the missing track.
The Federal Enforcement Template
The same month that NYC’s first 2024-25 NYSED submissions came due, two federal-style enforcement actions landed within weeks of each other.
On February 12, 2026, NY Attorney General Letitia James announced a settlement with Buffalo Public Schools. The four-year agreement requires an independent monitor, a Discipline Ombudsperson, revisions to the Code of Conduct, and implementation of restorative practices. The AG’s findings cited substantially higher suspension rates for students with disabilities and lost instructional time. Black students in Buffalo were more than six times more likely than white peers to receive out-of-school suspensions. Latino students were nearly four times more likely.
In the same month, the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division concluded that Special School District of St. Louis County had secluded more than 300 students nearly 4,000 times and restrained nearly 150 students 777 times. The DOJ findings document the federal template that can be applied to any district where the underlying data shows similar patterns.
The legal vehicles in both cases were Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Disparate-impact disability discrimination is the federal hook. The state and federal evidence are now both available for NY districts in a way they were not three years ago.
The Legal Framework for Families
When a NYC student is restrained, secluded, or otherwise injured at school, several legal vehicles are available. The procedural deadlines and elements differ.
General Municipal Law § 50-e Notice of Claim
Note
A Notice of Claim must be served on the NYC DOE within 90 days of the incident under General Municipal Law § 50-e. The lawsuit must be filed within one year and 90 days. Late notice motions under § 50-e(5) are available, but only up to one year and 90 days. The 90-day deadline is the most common reason NYC school injury cases die. For special education families navigating IEP fights at the same time, it is easy to miss.
42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal civil rights claims for constitutional violations. Excessive restraint can support a Fourth Amendment unreasonable seizure claim. State-created danger and conscience-shocking conduct can support a Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 has a three-year statute of limitations in NY (borrowed from the personal injury statute) and does not require a Notice of Claim.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
Federal disability discrimination statute applicable to recipients of federal funding (which includes NYC public schools). The vehicle for disparate-impact and intentional-discrimination claims based on disability.
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act
Federal disability discrimination statute applicable to public entities. Often pleaded together with Section 504 in school cases.
The IDEA, 20 U.S.C. § 1400
When restraint substitutes for a properly developed and implemented behavior intervention plan, the result is a denial of free appropriate public education. IDEA claims must generally be exhausted through impartial hearings before federal court. The L.V. v. NYC DOE consent decree in the Southern District of NY (Judge Loretta Preska) is the systemic vehicle for impartial hearing implementation. As of August 2025, only 9.5% of nearly 3,400 NYC special-ed service orders were implemented within the 35-day window required by the consent decree, and only 1% of nearly 5,300 payment orders were fulfilled on time.
Common Law Negligence, Negligent Supervision, Negligent Hiring and Retention
Standard NY tort claims, subject to the 50-e Notice of Claim requirement.
The combination of state and federal claims is the standard architecture in serious cases. The state claims compensate. The federal claims drive systemic reform.
What to Watch
The statewide data has landed. Two specific signals matter now.
The NYC and District 75 breakout. NYSED’s October 31, 2025 statewide release reported more than 3,600 students restrained or placed in timeout in at least 20,000 incidents, but it did not isolate NYC, and roughly 20% of public schools did not report at all.
District 75 is the NYC DOE’s specialized district serving students with significant disabilities, and its restraint and seclusion numbers would be the most consequential figures in any city breakout. National CRDC data establishes that students with disabilities are restrained at more than five times the rate of nondisabled peers. District 75 serves the population most likely to appear in the data, so a city-level or district-level disclosure is the number to press for.
The disability disproportionality ratio once NYC figures surface. The federal pattern is a 13% disability share of enrollment producing more than three-quarters of all students subjected to restraint and seclusion. Whether NYC’s numbers land at, above, or below the federal pattern will shape whether the AG and the DOJ have the predicate evidence for action under Section 504 and Title II of the ADA, which is the federal template that took down Buffalo and St. Louis SSD in February 2026.
The statewide data is out. What happens next for NYC depends on whether the city-level numbers come to light and what they show.
Sources
- NYSED. Reporting Student Behavioral Interventions, 2024-25 (revised). https://www.nysed.gov/memo/information-reporting-services/reporting-student-behavioral-interventions-2024-25-revised
- Cornell LII. 8 NYCRR § 19.5: Prohibition of Corporal Punishment, Aversive Interventions, Prone Restraint, and Seclusion. https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/new-york/8-NYCRR-19.5
- Cornell LII. 8 NYCRR § 200.22: Program Standards for Behavioral Interventions for Students with Disabilities. https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/new-york/8-NYCRR-200.22
- SCI. Annual Report CY 2024. https://nycsci.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/SCI-Annual-Report-CY24.pdf
- NY Attorney General. (February 12, 2026). Buffalo Public Schools Settlement. https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2026/attorney-general-james-secures-landmark-agreement-reform-student-discipline
- U.S. Department of Justice. (February 2026). Special School District of St. Louis County Findings. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-finds-special-school-district-st-louiss-seclusion-and-restraint-practices
- OCR. Civil Rights Data Collection 2017-18 Data Notes (NYC Action Plan Citation). https://civilrightsdata.ed.gov/assets/for-researchers/data-notes/Data-Notes-CRDC-2017-18.pdf
- OCR. Civil Rights Data Collection 2020-21 Release. https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/civil-rights-laws/civil-rights-data-collection-crdc/civil-rights-data/civil-rights-data-collection-crdc-2020-2021-school-year
- Brookings. Restraint and Seclusion: How Policy Has Failed to Curtail the Use of Dangerous Practices in U.S. Public Schools. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/restraint-and-seclusion-how-policy-has-failed-to-curtail-the-use-of-dangerous-practices-in-us-public-schools/
- City and State NY. (October 2024). NYC Paid $160 Million in Settlements Under Child Victims Act. https://www.cityandstateny.com/policy/2024/10/nyc-paid-160-million-settlements-under-child-victims-act/400586/
- Chalkbeat. (August 2025). NYC Special Education Federal Court Order L.V. Compliance. https://www.chalkbeat.org/newyork/2025/08/05/nyc-special-education-federal-court-order-lv-compliance/
- Public.Law. NY General Municipal Law § 50-e (Notice of Claim). https://newyork.public.law/laws/n.y._general_municipal_law_section_50-e
Updated June 14, 2026
Frequently asked questions
- What is NY's new restraint and seclusion reporting law?
On August 2, 2023, the NY Board of Regents adopted 8 NYCRR § 19.5, which bans seclusion, prone restraint, corporal punishment, and aversive interventions in NY schools. The companion regulation, 8 NYCRR § 200.22, sets program standards for behavioral interventions for students with disabilities, including required functional behavioral assessments, behavior intervention plans, and parent notification. Beginning with the 2024-25 school year, every public school district, BOCES, charter, state-operated and private residential school must file an annual report to NYSED documenting physical restraint, timeout, and substantiated and unsubstantiated allegations of corporal punishment, mechanical restraint, prone restraint, aversive interventions, and seclusion. Reports are submitted through the Student Information Repository System using the eScholar Student Restraint Event template.
- How much restraint and seclusion happens in NYC schools?
There is still no public NYC-specific number. NYSED released its first statewide 2024-25 dataset on October 31, 2025, reporting more than 3,600 students restrained or placed in timeout in at least 20,000 incidents, but roughly 20% of public schools did not report and the state did not break out NYC or District 75. Federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) numbers from 2017-18 cannot answer the question either, because NYC was placed on an Action Plan that year and its restraint and seclusion module was effectively zeroed out due to large amounts of missing data. National CRDC data establishes the baseline pattern: students with disabilities make up 13% of US enrollment but more than three-quarters of students subjected to restraint and seclusion. Black students are 15% of enrollment but 35% of students secluded and 34% of students subjected to mechanical restraint.
- Can my family sue if my child was restrained or injured at a NYC school?
Several legal vehicles are available. State law claims against the NYC DOE require a Notice of Claim within 90 days of the incident under General Municipal Law § 50-e, and the lawsuit must be filed within one year and 90 days. Federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Fourth Amendment unreasonable seizure, Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the IDEA do not require a Notice of Claim and have longer statutes of limitations. Disability discrimination claims under Section 504 and the ADA are the federal hooks that AG Letitia James used in her February 2026 settlement with Buffalo Public Schools and that the U.S. Department of Justice used the same month against Special School District of St. Louis County.
- What is District 75 and why does the data matter?
District 75 is the NYC DOE's specialized district for students with significant disabilities, including autism, intellectual disabilities, emotional disabilities, and multiple disabilities. It serves students at sites across all five boroughs. Because the national data shows students with disabilities are restrained at more than five times the rate of nondisabled peers, District 75's restraint and seclusion numbers are the most consequential. No public district-level NYC restraint figures exist for prior years. NYSED's first statewide 2024-25 release on October 31, 2025 still did not break out NYC or District 75, so a district-level count of how often students in District 75 are restrained or secluded remains unavailable to the public.
- What is the SCI and how does it relate to school abuse?
The Office of the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District (SCI) is the independent agency that investigates corruption, criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and serious misconduct affecting NYC schools. In its CY 2024 annual report, SCI received a record 11,874 complaints, initiated 484 investigations, and substantiated 171, finding 252 people or entities in violation. SCI specifically conducted 146 investigations into inappropriate or sexual misconduct by DOE staff or vendors, with 43 substantiated. SCI findings can support parallel civil litigation, FOIL requests, and Notice of Claim filings.
- What did the Child Victims Act change for NYC school abuse cases?
The Child Victims Act extended NY's statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse and opened a one-year revival window for time-barred claims that ran from August 14, 2019 through August 14, 2021. Of the more than 10,000 claims filed during the window, the Child USA Institute found roughly 13.4% named a public or non-public school as defendant. NYC paid more than $160 million in CVA settlements through October 2024, with 135 of 161 NYC settlements against the DOE or former DOE employees. That works out to an average of roughly $994,000 across all 161 settlements. Less than 13% of NYC CVA cases had moved past discovery as of that report, meaning the settlement total continues to grow.
Injured in NYC? Talk to a Trial Lawyer.
Free consultation. No fee unless we win.
For journalists, researchers, and re-publishers
Use this insight
Cite this insight
Three formats. Click to copy. Use whichever your style guide accepts.
APA AP style BibTeX
Antin, J. S. (2026, April 25). NYC School Restraint and Seclusion: NY's New Reporting Law. AEE Law Insights. https://aeelaw.com/insights/nyc-school-restraint-seclusion-data/
Contact the data desk
AEE Law editorial desk. Press inquiries answered within one business day.
Contact the data desk
If you were injured in New York and need a lawyer, get Jeff's read on your case.
More from AEE Law Insights
Five Years Later, New York's Traffic Deaths Are Still 18% Above 2019
New York recorded 1,101 traffic deaths in 2024, 17.9% more than the 934 recorded in 2019, the state's pre-pandemic low. Deaths peaked at 1,182 in 2022 and have eased since, but they remain well above where they stood before the pandemic. The decade of steady declines that ran through 2019 has not resumed.
New York's Deadliest Roads Aren't in the City. They're Upstate.
From 2019 to 2023, Genesee County recorded 51 traffic deaths against a population near 58,000, a rate of 88 per 100,000 residents over those five years. Manhattan's five-year rate was 11.5. Genesee's was 7.6 times higher. Thirty counties, nearly all of them rural and upstate, were deadlier per person than any New York City borough, even though the city recorded far more crashes overall.
New York's Own Checkpoint Schedule Gives Away the Real Danger Days
NYPD collision records for 2014 through 2024 show July 3rd and July 5th combined average 166.8 people injured per day, 11.3% above every other day of the year. July 4th itself runs flat, 150.5 injured against a 149.8 baseline. Nationally, July 4th is the single deadliest calendar day on record, 25 years running, and the sharpest local spike inside that window hits at 10pm, not the afternoon. New York's own statewide numbers point past the Fourth too. July 5th ranks worse than July 4th for road deaths over the same 25-year record.